به زراعی کشاورزی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

داوران

عضویت و راهنمای پابلونز

دستورالعمل حذف نام داور از روی کامنت ها در برنامه Word

تأثیر کودهای زیستی و شیمیایی نیتروژن دار و فسفردار بر رشد، عملکرد و درصد اسیدهای چرب گلرنگ درکشت مخلوط با باقلا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 استاد، گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

4 دانشیار، بخش تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تبریز، ایران.

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف مطالعه اثر کاربرد کودهای شیمیایی و زیستی بر خصوصیات رشدی، عملکرد و درصد اسیدهای چرب گیاه گلرنگ در کشت مخلوط با باقلا به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه تبریز در دو سال زراعی 1393-1394 و 1394-1395 انجام شد. تیمارهای کشت خالص گلرنگ، خالص باقلا و مخلوط گلرنگ و باقلا با نسبت 1:1 و 2:1 به عنوان عامل اول و مصرف کود در چهار سطح عدم کاربرد کود، کاربرد 100 درصد کود شیمیایی (اوره+ سوپرفسفات تریپل)، مصرف تلفیقی 30 و60 درصد کود شیمیایی بعلاوه کودهای زیستی (ازتوبارور 1 و فسفات بارور 2) به عنوان عامل دوم بودند. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین شاخص کلروفیل برگ، ارتفاع و تعداد شاخه فرعی در بوته به سیستم کشت مخلوط 1:1 و مصرف تلفیقی 60 درصد کود شیمیایی بعلاوه کودهای زیستی تعلق داشت. همچنین کاربرد تلفیقی کود زیستی بعلاوه 60 درصد کود شیمیایی، عملکرد دانه، درصد روغن و اسیدهای چرب لینولئیک و لینولنیک را افزایش داد. بیشترین میزان نسبت برابری زمین در سیستم کشت مخلوط 1:1 به همراه مصرف تلفیقی کود زیستی بعلاوه 60 درصد کود شیمیایی حاصل شد. افت عملکرد واقعی کل در هر دو سال زراعی در همه کشت‌های مخلوط بزرگتر از صفر بدست آمد که نشان می‌دهد سیستم کشت مخلوط نسبت به خالص نتیجه مثبتی بر عملکرد دانه داشت. در مجموع برای تولید گلرنگ با کمیت و کیفیت بهتر، کاربرد تلفیقی کودهای زیستی با شیمیایی در شرایط کشت مخلوط با باقلا، مناسب به نظر می رسد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of nitrogenous and phosphorous biological and chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and fatty acid compositions of Safflower intercropped with Faba bean

نویسندگان [English]

  • mahmoodreza saeidi 1
  • YaghoubY Raei 2
  • Rouhollah Amini 3
  • Bahman Pasban Eslam 4
  • Asal Rohi Saralan 1

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Division, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tabriz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

This research was investigated to study the application of chemical and biofertilizers on growth, yield and fatty acids composition of safflower intercropped with faba bean based on a randomized complete block design with three replications at the Research Farm of University of Tabriz during two growing seasons of 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. Intercropping ratios of safflower and faba bean including 1:1, 2:1, and their sole cropping and four levels of fertilizers including no fertilizer, 100 percent chemical fertilizer, 30 percent and 60 percent chemical fertilizer + biofertilizer (Azoto barvar 1 and phosphate barvar 2) were evaluated. Results showed that the highest Chlorophyll content, plant height and number of branch per plant were devoted to safflower/faba bean intercropping (1:1) with application of 60 percent chemical plus biological fertilizers. Also, integrated use of chemical and biological fertilizers caused the increasing of seed yield, oil content (33.81 percent) and linoleic (76.97 percent) and linolenic (0.32 percent) fatty acids. The highest land equivalent ratio (1.41) was achieved in intercropped plants (1:1) with integrated use of 60 percent chemical and biological fertilizers. For both years, total actual yield loss for all intercrops was more than zero, which indicates the positive advantage of intercropping over the pure one. Overall, intercropping (safflower/faba bean) with integrated use of the chemical and biological fertilizers, can recommend as an appropriate manner for the production of safflower with a better quality and quantity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biofertilizer
  • Faba bean
  • Faty acid composition
  • intercropping
  • Land equivalent ratio
  • Oil percent
  • Safflower
مراجع
Abdelkader, M. A. I. & Hamad, E. H. A. (2015). Evaluation of productivity and competition indices of safflower and fenugreek as affected by intercropping pattern and foliar fertilization rate. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 4(4): 956-966.
Ahmadvand, G. & Hajinia, S. (2015). Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of Soybean (Glycine max L.) and Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Agroecology, 7(4): 485-498. (In Persian).
Akbari, P., Ghalavand, A. & Modarres Sanavy, S. A. M. (2009). Effects of different nutrition systems and biofertilizer (PGPR) on phenology period yield and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Journal of Crop Production, 2(3): 119-134. (In Persian).
AOCS. (1993) Official methods and recommended practices. The American Oil Chemists Society Champaign.
Arslan, B. (2007). The determination of oil content and fatty acid composition of domestic and exotic safflower genotypes and their relationship. Journal of Agronomy, 6: 415-420.
Aseretal, G. K. (2008). Biofertilizers improve plant growth, fruit yield, nutrition, and metabolism and rhizosphere enzyme activities of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Bioresource Technology, 97(6): 98-109.
Balogh, A., Pepo, P. & Hornok, M. (2006). Interactions of crop year, fertilization and variety in winter Wheat management. Cereal Research Communications, 34(1): 389-392.
Banik, P. (1996). Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and legume. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 176: 289- 294.
Cakmakc, C. I. R., Donmez, F., Aydin, A. & Sahin, F. S. (2006). Growth promotion of plants by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38:1482-1487.
Chimonyo, V. G. P., Modi, A. T. & Mabhaudhi, T. (2016). Water use and productivity of a sorghum-cowpea-bottle gourd intercrop system. Agricultural Water Management, 165: 82-96.
Cosge, B., Gurbuz, B. & Kiralan, M. (2007). Oil content and fatty acid composition of some Safflower varieties sown in spring and winter. International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 1: 11-15.
Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Amon, T. & Kaul, H. P. (2011). Competition and yield in intercrops of maize and sunflower for biogas. Industrial Crops and Products, 34(1): 1203-1211.
Dwomon, I. B. & Quainoo, A. K. (2012). Effect of spatial arrangement on the yield of maize and groundnut intercrop in the northern guinea savanna agro-ecological zone of Ghana. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research, 1(2): 78-85.
Fernandez-Moya, V., Martinez-Force, E. & Garces, R. (2005). Oils from improved high stearic acid sunflower seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53:5326-5330.
Flagella, Z., Rotunnon, T., Tarantino, E., DiCaterina, R. & Decaro, A. (2002). Changes in seed yield and oil fatty acid composition of high oleic sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) hybrids in relation to sowing date and water regime. European Journal of Agronomy, 17: 221-230.
Fuente, E. B., Suarez, S. A., Lenardis, A. E. & Poggio, S. L. (2014). Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems: Evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages. NJAS - Wageningen journal of Life science, 70: 47-52.
Ghosh, P.K. (2004). Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research, 88: 227-237.
Imran, M., Ali, A., Waseem, M., Tahir, M., Ullah, A., Mohsin, Sh., Ghaffari, A. & Rehman, H. (2011). Bio-economic assessment of sunflower-mung bean intercropping system at different planting geometry. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 1:126-136.
Knowles, P. F. (1989). Safflower. In: Oil crops of the world (ed. Robbelen, G., R. K. Dowoney and A. Ashri), pp. 363-374. MCGraw – Hill, NewYork.
Lajara, J. R., Diaz, U. & Diaz, Q. (1990). Definite influence of localization and climatic conditions on fatty acid composition of sunflower seed oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 67: 618-623.
Layek, J., Shivakumar, B. G., Rana, D. S., Munda, S. & Lakshman, K. (2015). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield, intercropping indices and produce quality of different soybean (Glycine max) + cereal intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 60(2): 230-235.
Lin, C. W., Chen, Y. C., Huang, J. & Tu, T. (2007). Temporal variation of plant height, plant cover and leaf area index in intercropped area of Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26: 989- 994.
Maffei, M. & Mucciarelli, A. (2003). Essential oil yield in peppermint/soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 84: 229-240.
Mirshekari, B., Baser, S. & Javanshir, A. (2009). Effect of seed inoculation with nitragin and different levels of urea on physiological traits and biologic yield of maize, cv. 704 grown in cold and semi-arid regions. New Finding in Agriculture, 3(4): 403-411. (In Persian).
Mirzakhani, M., Ardakani, M. R., Aeene Band, A., Rejali, F. & Shirani Rad, A. H. (2009). Response of spring safflower to co-inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum and Glomus intraradices under different levels of nitrogen and phosphourus. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 4: 255-261.
Naghizade, M., Ramroodi, M., Galavi, M., Siahsar, B., Heydari, M. & Maghsoodi, A. A. (2012). The Effects of Various Phosphorus Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components of Maize and Grass Pea Intercropping. Iranian Journal of Filed crop Science, 43(2): 203-215. (In Persian).
Nasrollahzadeh Asl, A., Chavoshgoli, A., Valizadegan, E., Valiloo, R. & Nasrollahzadeh Asl,V. (2012a). Evaluation of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) and Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping based on additive method. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 22(2): 79-90. (In Persian).
Nasrollahzadeh Asl, A., Dabbag Mohammadi Nassab, A., Zehtab Salmasi, S., Mogaddam, M. & Javanshir, A. (2012b). Evaluation of Potato and Pinto bean Intercropping. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 6(2):111-126. (In Persian)
Nielsen, H. H., Ambus, P. & Jensen, E. S. (2001). Interspecific competition N use and interference with weeds in pea barley intercropping. Field Crops Research, 70: 101-109.
Ojaghloo, F., Farahvash, F., Hassan-Zadeh, A. & Pour-Yusef, M. (2007). Effect of inoculation with Azotobacter and barvar phosphate biofertilizers on yield of safflower. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3: 25-30. (In Persian).
Omidi, H., Tahmasebi, Z., Torabi, H. & Miransari, M. (2008). Soil enzymatic activities and available P and Zn as affected by tillage practices, canola cultivars and planting date. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44: 443–450.
Purdy, R. H. (1985). Oxidative stability of high oleic sunflower and safflower oils. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 62: 523-525. 
Raei, Y., Shariati, J. & Weisany, W. (2015). Effect of biological fertilizers on seed oil, yield and yield components of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) at different irrigation levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25(1): 65-84. (In Persian).
Rezaei Chianeh, E., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Shakiba, M. R., Ghassemi-Golezani, K. & Aharizad, S. (2011). Intercropping of maize and faba bean at different plant population densities. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7: 1786-1793.
Sabzalian, M. R., Saeidi, G. & Mirlohi, A. (2008). Oil content and fatty acid composition in seeds of three safflower species. Euphytica, 85: 717-721.
Seyed Sharifi, R., Namvar, A. & Seyed Sharifi, R. (2017). Grain filling and fatty acid composition of safflower fertilized with integrated nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizers. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 52: 236-243.
Silva, L. R., Pereira, M. J., Azevedo, J., Mulas, R., Velasquez, E., González-Andrés, F., Valentão, P. & Andrade, P. B. (2013). Inoculation with Brady rhizobium japonicum enhances the organic and fatty acids content of soybean seeds. Food Chemistry, 141: 3636-3648.
Skiner, F. A., Boddey, R. M. & Ferninik, F. (1987). Nitrogen fixation with non-legumes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. Pp 230.
Soleymanifard, A. & Siadat, S. A. (2011). Effect of inoculation with bio-fertilizer in different nitrogen levels on yield and yields components of safflower under dry land conditions. American Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 11: 473-477.
Strydhorst, S. M., King, J. R., Lopetinsky, K. J. & Neil Harker, K. (2008). Forage potential of intercropping barley with faba bean or field pea. Agronomy Journal, 100:182-190.
Uhart, S. A. & Andrade, F. H. (1995). Nitrogen deficiency in maize: II. Carbon nitrogen interaction effects on kernel number and grain yield. Crop Science, 35:1384-1389.
Velasco, L. & Fernandez- Martinez, J. M. (2001). Breeding for oil quality in safflower. Proceedings of the 5th International Safflower Conference. Williston, North Dakota and Sidney, USA 133-137.
Vandermeer, J. H. (1989). The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Yang, C., Iqbal, N., Hu, B., Zhang, Q., Wu, H., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Liu, W., Yang, W. & Liu, J. (2017). Targeted metabonomics analysis of fatty acid in soybean seed by GC-MS reveal the metabolic manipulation of shading in intercropping system. Analytical Methods, 3(1): 1-27.
Zafaranieh, M. (2015). Effect of various combinations of safflower and chickpea intercropping on yield and yield components of safflower. Agriculture Science Developments, 4: 31-34.
 
به زراعی کشاورزی
دوره 20، شماره 4
بهمن 1397
صفحه 769-784
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار