Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Crop Residues on Yield and Micronutrient Contents of Barley under Deficit Irrigation

Niazi Ardekani, Maryam; Barati, Vahid; Boostani, Hamid Reza; Bijanzadeh, Ehsan

doi:10.22059/jci.2021.298377.2354

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ M.Sc. Student, Agroecology Department. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Agroecology Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran.

³ Associate Professor, Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Darab , Iran.

⁴ Associate Professor, Agroecology Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2021.298377.2354

Abstract

This study was perform at the experimental farm of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University in 2017 - 2018 growing season. A split factorial experiment in a randomized complete block design with three replicates was carried out. Treatments included: two levels of irrigation as the main plots [normal irrigation (IRN): irrigation based on the plant's water requirement up to the physiological maturity and another factor was water stress (IRDI): irrigation based on the plant's water requirement up to the anthesis stage (cutting of irrigation after anthesis)]. Also, sub plots were two levels of wheat residues [1. without residue, 2. returning 30% of wheat residue to soil] and four fertilizer sources [N0, no nitrogen fertilizer (control); N100, 100 kg N ha-1; Bio + N50, Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense) + 50 kg N ha-1 and Bio, Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense)]. The results showed that the cut of irrigation after anthesis significantly decreased the micronutrients uptake of shoot and grain in barley. All fertilizer sources increased the uptake of micronutrients especially in normal irrigation conditions. Among the N sources, the Bio + N50 treatment was more effective in micronutrients uptake. Also, the highest grain yield in the normal irrigation and water stress condition was obtained in Bio + N50.

Keywords

References

Amoo-Aghaie, R., Mostajeran, A., & Emtiazi, G. (2003). Effect of Azospirillum inoculation on some growth parameters and yield of three wheat cultivars. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 7(2), 127-139. http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-469-en.html (In Persian)

Arzanesh, M.H., Alikhani, H., Khavazi, K., Rahimian, H., & Miransari, M. (2010). Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth enhancement by Azospirillum sp. under drought stress. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 27, 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0444-1

Arzanesh, M.H, Benny Aghil, N., Ghorbanly M.L., & Shahbazi, M. (2013). Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth parameters and levels of micronutrient on rapeseed cultivars under salinity stress. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 2(2), 153-163. (In Persian)

Barati, V., & Ghadiri, H. (2017). Assimilate and nitrogen remobilization of six-rowed and two-rowed winter barley under drought stress at different nitrogen fertilization. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 63(6), 841-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1238075

Biari, A., Gholami, A., & Rahmani, H. A. (2008). Growth promotion and enhanced nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) by application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in arid region of Iran. Journal of Biological Sciences, 8(6), 1015-1020.

Goteti, P. K., Emmanuel, L. D. A., Desai, S., & Shaik, M. H. A. (2013). Prospective zinc solubilising bacteria for enhanced nutrient uptake and growth promotion in maize (Zea mays L.). International journal of microbiology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/869697

Hadi, H., Babaei, N., Daneshian, J., Arzanesh, M., & Hamidi, A. (2012). Effects of Azospirillum lipoferum on seedling characteristics derived from sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) seed water deficit conditions. Agroecology, 3(3), 320-327. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v3i3.13557 (In Persian)

Hajeeboland, R., Asgharzadeh, N., & Mehrfar, Z. (2004). Ecological study of azotobacter in two pasture lands of the north-west iran and its inoculation effect on growth and mineral nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. omid) plants. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 8(2), 75-90. URL: http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-426-fa.html (In persian)

Heidari, M., & Jahantighi, H. (2014). Evaluate effect of water stress and different amounts of nitrogen fertilizer on seed quality of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 11(4), 640-647. https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v11i4.32892 (In Persian)

Institute S. (2004). SAS/GRAPH 9.1 Reference. SAS Institute.

Khamadi, F., Mesgarbashi, M., Hosaibi, P., Enaiat, N., & Farzaneh, M. (2015). The effect of crop residue and nitrogen fertilizer levels on soil biological properties and nitrogen indices and redistribution of dry matter in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Applied Field Crops Research, 28(4), 149-157. doi: 10.22092/aj.2016.106752 (In Persian)

Khosravi, H. (2015). Azotobacter and its role in soil fertility management. Land Management Journal, 2(2), 79-94. doi: 10.22092/lmj.2015.101241 (In Persian)

Maleki Farahani, S., Chaichi, M.R., Mazaheri, D., Tavakkol Afshari, R., & Savaghebi, G. (2010). Chemical analysis of barley under different irrigation and fertilizing systems. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 22(3), 2397- 1406.

Marulanda, A., Barea, A. J. M., & Azcón, R. (2009). Stimulation of plant growth and drought tolerance by native microorganisms (AM fungi and bacteria) from dry environments: mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 28, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9079-6

Molina, R., Rivera, D., Mora, V., López, G., Rosas, S., Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Cassán, F., (2018). Regulation of IAA biosynthesis in Azospirillum brasilense under environmental stress conditions. Current microbiology, 75(10), 1408-1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-018-1537-6

Nezarat, S., & Gholami, A. (2010). The effects of co-inoculation of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas rhizobacteria on nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.). Agroecology, 1(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v1i1.2651.(In Persian)

Niaziardakani, M., Barati, V., Bijanzadeh, E., & Behpoori, A. (2019). Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer sources and crop residues on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under late season water stress conditions. Agroecology. 12(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v12i1.79989 (In Persian)

Pazoki, A. (2016). Effects of humic acid and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) on yield and yield components of durum wheat under drought stress condition in Shahr-e-Rey region. Cereal Research, 6(1), 105-117. (In Persian)

Rafiee, M., Nadian, H. A., Nour-Mohammadi, G., & Karimi, M. (2004). Effects of drought stress, phosphorous and zinc application on concentration and total nutrient uptake by corn (Zea mays L.). Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 35(1), 235- 243. (In Persian)

Rajaee, S., Alikhani, H. A., & Raiesi, F. (2007). Effect of plant growth promoting potentials of Azotobacter chroococcum native strains on growth, yield and uptake of nutrients in wheat. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 11 (41), 285-297. http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-760-fa.html. (In Persian)

Rejali, F., Alizadeh, A., Malakouti. M.J., & Saleh Rastin, N. (2007). The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in growth, yield and nutrient uptake in wheat under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 21(2), 241-259. (In persian)

Sadeghi, H. (2007). Effects of crop residue and nitrogen rate on morpho-physiological traits, yield and yield components of two dry land wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian)

Sarig, S., Blum, A., & Okon, Y. (1988). Improvement of the water status and yield of field-grown grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) by inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 110, 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600081296

Shahpari, Z., Fateh, E., & Aineband, A. (2016). Different residue type and management and nitrogen on yield and quality of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). Journal of Crop Production, 9(3), 87-104. doi: 10.22069/ejcp.2016.9713.1756. (In persian)

Sheng, X. F. (2005). Growth promotion and increased potassium uptake of cotton and rape by a potassium releasing strain of Bacillus edaphicus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(10), 1918-1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.026

Van Herwaarden, A., Farquhar, G., Angus, J., Richards, R., & Howe, G. (1998). 'Haying-off', the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer. I. Biomass, grain yield, and water use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 1067-1082. https://doi.org/10.1071/A97039

Journal of Crops Improvement

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Crop Residues on Yield and Micronutrient Contents of Barley under Deficit Irrigation

References

References

Volume 23, Issue 3
September 2021
Pages 470-453

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Crop Residues on Yield and Micronutrient Contents of Barley under Deficit Irrigation

References

References

Volume 23, Issue 3September 2021Pages 470-453

Volume 23, Issue 3
September 2021
Pages 470-453