shakiba shahmoradi
Abstract
Genetic resources of Iranian rye have a high adaptation and diversity which provides the required forage in diverse climates of our country. Utilization of these resources is important in the development of new varieties. In this study, nine rye ecotypes, along with commercial cultivars of rye, barley, ...
Read More
Genetic resources of Iranian rye have a high adaptation and diversity which provides the required forage in diverse climates of our country. Utilization of these resources is important in the development of new varieties. In this study, nine rye ecotypes, along with commercial cultivars of rye, barley, and triticale have been evaluated in three growing seasons 2014-15, 2016-17 and 2017-18 in research field of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. The research is carried out in three separate experiments in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The study of phenological, morphological, and agronomic traits show that interaction of year and ecotype is significant for all traits, except for days to flowering. Based on the dry forage yield, Ecotype 119 has had the highest mean and Triticale cultivar, the lowest (5.68 and 4.14 t/ha respectively). Correlation coefficeint between grain yield, forage yield, 1000 kernel weight, and flag leaf area is significant. Comparison of ADF percentage in the forage show that these traits are significantly lower in ecotype 119 and barley cultivar Valfajr than other samples (60% and 56%, respectively). Based on the average of fiber in forage, Ecotype 119 has had the lowest average (33%). It seems that Ecotype 119, in addition to high potential for forage production, also has good forage quality.
Mehrnoosh Garshasbi; Mohammad Rafieiolhossaini; Sina Fallah; Ali Ashraf Jafari; Shamsali Rezazadeh
Abstract
Some medicinal plants have an important role in production of fodder with high quality. While reducing the production costs, they protect the environment, water, and soil resources. On the other hand, mixed cultivation and application of organic and biological fertilizers or proper combination of these ...
Read More
Some medicinal plants have an important role in production of fodder with high quality. While reducing the production costs, they protect the environment, water, and soil resources. On the other hand, mixed cultivation and application of organic and biological fertilizers or proper combination of these two with chemical fertilizers can be considered a solution to increase crop yield in sustainable agriculture. For this purpose, in order to investigate the effects of different treatments of fertilizer and ratios of mixed cultivation of Chicory and annual Medic, a factorial experiment has been conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications at the experimental field located in Behbahan city in 2019-2020 growing season. The first factor has been different fertilizer sources (Chemical, Organic, and Integrated) in three levels: chemical fertilizer, vermicompost fertilizer and combined fertilizer (nitroxin biofertilizer + fertile phosphate 2 + 50% chemical fertilizer) and the second factor has been five intercropping patterns including: sole chicory (SC), sole annual medic (SM), one row of chicory: one row of annual medic (C1M1), one row of chicory: two rows of annual medic (C1M2) and two rows of chicory: one row of annual medic (C2M1). The studied traits are forage yield of chicory and annual medic and quality characteristics of forage including percentage and yield of crude protein, percentage of ash, crude fiber, dry matter digestibility, calcium, and phosphorus content of forage. The results show that the highest dry forage yields of chicory and medic (4.04 and 4.63 t/ ha, respectively) are obtained in monoculture and chemical fertilizer treatment. Mixed cultivation ratios and application of combined fertilizers and vermicompost improve crude protein and ash of medic and crude fiber of chicory forage without reducing any other quality traits. Evaluation of land equivalent ratio show the superiority of all mixed ratios over monoculture of these plants. Finally, mixed cultivation treatments C1M1 and C2M1 with a land equivalent ratio of 1.3 and a total yield of 5.44 and 4.95 tons per hectare and the application of combined fertilizer are recognized as superior treatments.
Abdollah Hasanzadeh Gorttapeh; Saeid Heydarzadeh; Amir Rahimi
Abstract
Amaranth forage plants, due to their nutritional properties and ability to adapt to drought conditions, can be a good option to deal with water deficiency and increased productivity under different fertilizer systems. This experiment spans for 2 years in form of a complete random block design based on ...
Read More
Amaranth forage plants, due to their nutritional properties and ability to adapt to drought conditions, can be a good option to deal with water deficiency and increased productivity under different fertilizer systems. This experiment spans for 2 years in form of a complete random block design based on a factorial with three replications, three levels of irrigation (irrigation after depleting 40%, 60%, and 75% of available water) as the first factor and organic (cow manure and phosphate-2), chemical (phosphorus and nitrogen), integrated, and control (no fertilizer) fertilizer systems as the second one. Results of this study show that crude protein, digestibility of dry matter, water-soluble carbohydrates, digestible nutrients, relative nutritional value, and specific energy of lactation, due to the application of different fertilizer systems in each irrigation level have been improved, compared to non-consumption of the fertilizer. The performance of biomass and forage protein are increased by 38.89% and 54.37%, 30.60% and 41.23%, and 22.20% and 34.92% in optimal, moderate, and severe stress conditions, respectively in integrated fertilizer system than the control. Also, this study shows that the use of organic fertilizers alone or combined with chemical fertilizers improve quantitative and qualitative traits of amaranthus forage irrigation after depleting 40% and 60% of available water. So, optimal use of biological inputs for sustainable agriculture and reduction of pollution, caused by the use of chemical fertilizers, is recommended.
Elham Rastegari; Shahab Maddah Hosseini; Arman Azari
Abstract
In order to evaluate the effect of irrigation intervals on the vegetative growth and grain yield of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.), a field split plot experiment was conducted based on the randomized complete blocks design with four replications in research farm ...
Read More
In order to evaluate the effect of irrigation intervals on the vegetative growth and grain yield of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.), a field split plot experiment was conducted based on the randomized complete blocks design with four replications in research farm of Vali–e–Asr University of Rafsanjan during April to July, 2013. Main plots were irrigation levels including 40, 60, 80 and 100 mm evaporation from evaporation pan class A and sub plots were crop species in two levels as grass pea and hairy vetch. Result showed that 66 days after sowing (two weeks before flowering), relative water content (RWC) of grass pea and hairy vetch leaves significantly reduced by increasing irrigation amount more than 40 mm, however there were no significant differences between 60, 80 and 100 mm. Also, plant leaf area and biomass of grass pea and vetch were reduced by increasing irrigation level (77 and 73 percent, respectively). Both crops had similar biomass (1.1 and 1.2 g. plant -1 for control and 0.5 and 0.6 for 100 mm irrigation treatments for grass pea and vetch, respectively), while the grass pea had higher leaf area than hairy vetch (4 to 9 folded). Finally, yield and yield components of both crops decreased by irrigation interval, although grass pea had always higher yield components, as grain yield, 1000 grains weight, seed number and pod number per plant at 100 mm irrigation treatment were 4.8, 2.4, 3.7 and 3.2 fold higher than vetch. Results suggest that both crops well tolerated increasing irrigation interval and they were suitable for forage production if harvested at the flowering stage. However, grass pea was better for grain production and had higher drought tolerance.
Ali Tadayyon; Mohammad Rafieiolhossaini
Abstract
In order to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative forage characteristics of different sainfoin ecotypes, a field experiment was conducted in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications at the Research Station of Agricultural College of Shahrekord University. In this experiment, ...
Read More
In order to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative forage characteristics of different sainfoin ecotypes, a field experiment was conducted in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications at the Research Station of Agricultural College of Shahrekord University. In this experiment, the amount of wet and dry weight of above-ground plants, plant height, and the protein and fiber contents were measured at three stages of pre-flowering, initiation of flowering and full flowering. The number of sainfoin forage cuts and variation of protein and fiber content at different forage cuts were analyzed by a split-plot on time. The results in this experiment showed that, the amount of wet, dry weight, plant height, and the protein and fiber contents were significantly affected at different ecotypes of sainfoin in all harvest stages and number of forage cutting was not significantly affected in all sainfoin ecotypes. Based on the data analysis according to split plot design in time, the factors of ecotypes and number of cutting were affected significantly. The 2nd and 4th cutting were produced maximum protein content and the 5th cutting produced maximum fiber content. The interaction between ecotype and number of cutting was not significant. Regarding to quantitative (yield) and qualitative (protein content) characteristics of forage, cultivation of Aligodarz ecotype of sainfoin showed superiority over other ecotypes.